Entry
My mail is not being delivered. The log says "deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/"
Jun 30th, 2006 12:56
Paul Theodoropoulos, Jeffrey Thompson, Dave Sill, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard, Guest, http://www.ckdhr.com./ckd/qmail-103.patch http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/Softwares/qmail/#any-to-cname
The "qmail.org" web site suggests that you may be able to get around
this problem somewhat by installing the "djbdns" package, and in
particular, "dnscache" from that package.
Installing "djbdns" is generally a good idea, but it does not
genuinely fix this problem.
The cause of this problem is as follows:
"qmail-remote" wants to perform "CNAME" lookups of the domain
names that mail is to be sent to. However, instead of doing a
"CNAME" DNS lookup directly, it performs an "ANY" DNS lookup
and scans the result for "CNAME" resource records. It does
this because of a bug in BIND version 4 that would be triggered
if it did "CNAME" lookups directly.
But "qmail" only employs a 512-byte buffer to receive the DNS
response. Unfortunately, an "ANY" lookup for several popular
domains (such as "aol.com.") now yields a response bigger than
512 bytes, and the DNS lookup fails because the response size
exceeds the size of the buffer that "qmail" has to hold it.
(An "ANY" response for "aol.com." was 543 bytes - and even that
was with the "glue" stripped - at the time of writing this
answer.)
Installing "dnscache" partially alleviates this problem because
"dnscache" provides smaller answers to "ANY" queries than other
proxy DNS server softwares, such as BIND, do. This happens to
defer the onset of this problem in most cases.
However, this is not a true solution. The problem can still occur
even if one employs "dnscache". The the maximum size that a DNS
response can be is 65536 bytes, and "qmail"'s DNS response buffer
should therefore be capable of holding responses up to this size.
The correct fix is to apply Christopher K. Davis' patch (hyperlink
given above) that increases "qmail"'s buffer to 65536 bytes.
Whilst you are about it, you also might consider applying the
patch (hyperlink given above) that makes "qmail" actually use
"CNAME" queries when it wants to look up "CNAME" resource
records.
[Edited to remove references to LWQ, which has been updated to
recommend
Davis' patch. -DS, 2021-03-02]