faqts : Education : Courses

+ Search
Add Entry AlertManage Folder Edit Entry Add page to http://del.icio.us/
Did You Find This Entry Useful?

1 of 1 people (100%) answered Yes
Recently 1 of 1 people (100%) answered Yes

Entry

What BJ counting system is most effective?
Why BJ counting system is most effective?
Is BJ counting system is most effective?

Dec 21st, 2007 04:42
James Buren, http://pokerguideforreview.blogspot.com http://www.worldgamingarticles.com


The playing efficiency, betting correlation, and insurance correlation
is listed below for several counting systems. These numbers give an
indication of the effectiveness of the counting system. When two numbers
are listed, the second number results from adding an ace side count in
addition to the "main" count.
See answer B3 for definitions of "betting correlation", "playing
efficiency", and "insurance correlation".
                  EXPLANATION OF COUNTING SYSTEMS
===========================================================================
  COUNTING           COUNTING VALUES         "BEST" EFFICIENCY  CORRELATION
  SYSTEMS      2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  X  A  SOURCE  PLAY+ace  BET+ace
INSURE
  --------     ----------------------------  ------  -------- --------
------
  Griffin      0  0  1  1  1  1  0  0 -1  0  Griffin  64-64+  .85-.95  .85
  Hi-Opt I     0  1  1  1  1  0  0  0 -1  0  Humble   61-63   .88-.97  .85
  Hi-Opt II    1  1  2  2  1  1  0  0 -2  0  Humble   67-67+  .91-.99  .91
  High-Low     1  1  1  1  1  0  0  0 -1 -1  Wong     51-63   .97     
.76-.85
  Ita          1  1  1  1  1  1  0 -1 -1 -1  Sys.Res. 53-63+  .96     
.69-.76
  Red 7's      1  1  1  1  1 **  0  0 -1 -1  Snyder   54-64+  .98     
.78-.87
  Unbal 10's   1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1 -2  1  Roberts  61-61+  .73-.94 1.00
  Uston +-     0  1  1  1  1  1  0  0 -1 -1  Uston    55-64+  .95     
.76-.85
  Uston APC    1  2  2  3  2  2  1 -1 -3  0  Uston    69-69+  .91-.99  .90
  Wong Halves  1  2  2  3  2  1  0 -1 -2 -2  Wong     57-67+  .99     
.72-.85
  Zen          1  1  2  2  2  1  0  0 -2 -1  Snyder   63-67+  .97     
.85-.91
                           ** red 7's +1, black 7's 0
  Note: Playing efficiencies have a practical maximum of about 0.7.
        "Unbal 10's" is short for "Unbalanced 10 Count"
For detail visit:
http://olympicssports.blogspot.com	
http://marchmadnessforum.blogspot.com	
http://soccertournament.blogspot.com	
http://horsebettingsite.blogspot.com	
http://winningplayatblackjack.blogspot.com	
http://kenogaming.blogspot.com	
http://gamebaccarat.blogspot.com	
http://roulettegame.blogspot.com	
http://onlineslotsentertainment.blogspot.com	
http://internetcraps.blogspot.com	
http://casinobackgammon.blogspot.com	
http://majorbaseball.blogspot.com	
http://ncaafootballseries.blogspot.com
http://www.chiefcyberpicks.com
http://www.onlinebingoreviewdirectory.com
http://www.onlinecasinoreviewdirectory.com
http://www.skillgameschief.com
http://www.skillgamesdirectory.com
http://www.skillgamesportal.com
http://www.skillgamesearch.com
http://www.onlinepokerreviewdirectory.com
http://www.pokerstarsnetwork.com
http://www.chiefbrand.com
http://www.chiefcyberpicks.us
http://www.NCAASportsBlog.com
http://www.casinogaminginsider.com
http://www.marchmadnessUSA.com
http://www.nflchampionshipblog.com
http://www.worldgamingarticles.com
http://www.superbowl.us
Sourse:conjelco.com